Lowering the standards for School Awards?

Everyone wins with SC low standards.jpg
With bumper lanes everyone is a winner!

The South Carolina public school machine operates through a bewildering assortment of committees, task forces, subcommittees, advisory panels, working groups and inter-agency partnerships.

Interestingly, most of these divergent groups march to the beat of a common drum: the unending chorus of “more money.”

Take the recent meeting of the Education Oversight Committee (EOC)’s so-called “Academic Standards and Assessments Subcommittee” or “ASAS.”

One of the responsibilities of the EOC’s ASAS is determining eligibility for public school awards. In late November the subcommittee submitted recommendations to re-write guidelines for the Palmetto Gold and Silver Awards.

Under the proposal:

  • Schools that meet an EOC determined standard will receive a “gold” award
  • Schools that fail to meet the standard but make some student-wide improvement will receive a “silver” award
  • Schools that fail to meet the standards but have some students make some improvement will receive a new “closing the gap” award.

Question about their merits aside, these awards are a big deal. That’s because they are tied to additional funding for the “awardee” schools. The awards -merited or not- also a lend an appearance of credibility and accomplishment to the schools in the eyes of parents, lawmakers and community members.

The awards further draw attention away from the 8-in-10 federal AYP failure rate, the 51 percent high school dropout rate, the widening racial gaps and the inability of the “best” public schools to compete with public schools in the Southeast.

Under the new criteria EOC ASAS members predict an immediate jump of 50 percent in awards issued. Based on the rule changes some 356 schools will now be eligible, compared to 239 last year.

Reworking the faux-awards is part of the larger ongoing effort to strip South Carolina’s accountability laws, water down the state’s standardized testing, and mis-report data to parents and the press.

It is worth noting what the subcommittee did not address. Namely, how South Carolina’s bizarre public school funding system actually rewards low student achievement through ever-higher state spending at schools with long term performance failures while also giving out cash awards for improvement,

Also absent from the debate was the growing concern that financial rewards for test score gains might lead to unintended consequences (e.g. Mishawna Moore and the Clyde-Sanders PACT cheating scandal).


2 responses to “Lowering the standards for School Awards?

  1. This approch has been used in special education for years.

    If your high school child knows all of the words to The Wheels on the bus go round and round, you will get updates that indicate that he/she is making great progress. If they are able to tell you the color of that bus, they will “qualify out of special education” just in time the statistics to reflect that their dropping out of school is among the general population and had nothing to do with the educational services the janator of the school was providing in the special education setting.

    If standards get much lower, children will be recieving honorable mentions for breathing and blinking.

  2. dont forget the RED CARPET AWARDS
    which near as i can tell -trying to cut through the spin and p.r.- are given out for NO academic reason at all!
    Yea fruitless public education SC! It feels so good to accomplish nothing but get awards!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s