School choice shouldn’t be confined to college students


A guest editorial from the opinion page of November 29th’s Charleston Post and Courier:

People like choices.

This simple aphorism is the basis of South Carolina’s most popular and far-reaching educational reform in the last four decades: state scholarships for higher education.

Throughout South Carolina the HOPE, LIFE and Palmetto Fellows Scholarships have helped thousands of students attend college. Many of the students come from disadvantaged circumstances. Some will be the first in their family to attend college. For others the scholarship helps lighten the load of high interest student loans.

These scholarships can be used at a wide range of public and private colleges and universities. This is a personal choice, rightly left to students and their parents.

The basic concept is simple. College graduates are important for the state’s economy. Helping students obtain a higher degree serves a public purpose. Extending the opportunity to low-income students also reduces social and economic inequality.

These scholarships are an excellent example of school choice. Parents, educators and lawmakers have praised them unanimously.

Which begs the questions: why aren’t we offering similar choices to students in grades K through 12?

It can’t be an issue of student age. State lawmakers have already created a school choice model of tuition scholarships for pre-kindergarten children through First Steps, which has served thousands of low-income families since 1992.

And it is not a matter of money. Per-student spending in South Carolina’s public schools averages $11,480 while proposals for choice scholarships and tax credits rarely exceed $2,500. This would result in a financial windfall for the public schools, which receive most of their money through programs that are funded in block grants.

There must be something peculiar to the K-12 system. Neither public colleges nor public pre-kindergarten schools lobbied to fight against school choice. Both saw it as an exciting expansion of access, not as a threat.

The big difference with K-12 schools is political.

The K-12 public school system is a $7.9 billion dollar a year institution that believes it has the sole civic and moral authority to educate children in South Carolina. It is has raised protection of the organizational status quo above the instructional needs of students. This is a shame.

Through political partnerships with the teachers’, administrators’, superintendents’ and school boards’ unions it has spent millions of dollars to fight change. It even worked hard to block scholarships targeted at special needs and high disability students.

The most telling insight about this mean-spirited fight came from Debi Bush, president of the South Carolina School Boards Association. She recently described a call for universal educational access as a negative attack on “dedicated public school teachers, principals, students and parents.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

Parents in upper- middle- and high-income families already enjoy K-12 choices. They can move between attendance zones or districts, place their kids in a private school or sacrifice a parent’s time and income in order to home school their child. Many other families don’t have these luxuries.

The Department of Education estimates that average private school tuition in the United States was $6,600 per student last year. The average rate was even lower in South Carolina. This is half of public school per-student spending. A $1,000 tax credit or a $2,500 scholarship would dramatically expand the number of families in South Carolina who could afford to consider homeschooling or private schools. This would free millions of dollars for traditional public schools. It would also be a better way to fund public charter, magnet and virtual schools that are struggling to win their share of financial support from local school districts.

Choice has worked well for pre-kindergarten and college students in South Carolina. It has greatly expanded student access to quality instruction. This has benefited the students as well as the public in general.

Students in grades K through 12 deserve the same opportunities.

Randy Page is president of South Carolinians for Responsible Government.


22 responses to “School choice shouldn’t be confined to college students

  1. Gretchen Krane

    There is something else the public school system could do to provide an education for students who do not excel in the normal school setting. It’s called TRADE SCHOOLS. Why not take the children who are not interested in history and english and teach them a trade. Sooner or later they will have to read about whatever trade they are learning, and once they are interested, they too, will learn. It’s a very simple concept for plumbers, electricians, auto mechanics, brick layers, etc. Let’s have South Carolina be a leader for a change, instead of being at the bottom of the list for education

  2. Pingback: A “minimally adequate” political ploy « The Voice for School Choice

  3. Pingback: OUTRAGE in McClellanville « The Voice for School Choice

  4. Pingback: Spartanburg Parents want choice, superintendent doesn’t « The Voice for School Choice

  5. Pingback: The Farce of Public School Transfers « The Voice for School Choice

  6. Pingback: FACT CHECK: Jim Rex’s “Begin in ‘10″ « The Voice for School Choice

  7. Pingback: What the Meeting Street Academy means for Charleston « The Voice for School Choice

  8. Pingback: School Choice: for strong families « The Voice for School Choice

  9. Pingback: Obama slammed on School Choice « The Voice for School Choice

  10. Pingback: South Carolina Education Opportunity Act (S.520) « The Voice for School Choice

  11. Pingback: Sen. Ryberg on South Carolina public schools (VIDEO) « The Voice for School Choice

  12. Pingback: Public School funding plan for South Carolina « The Voice for School Choice

  13. Pingback: Sunshine on Public Schools in South Carolina « The Voice for School Choice

  14. Pingback: Parents are the worst people to bring up children?! « The Voice for School Choice

  15. Pingback: School Choice could save South Carolina $400 million « The Voice for School Choice

  16. Pingback: School Choice introduced in SC House « The Voice for School Choice

  17. Pingback: Senators: School Choice a cash-windfall for public schools « The Voice for School Choice

  18. Pingback: Converse Chellis: School choice makes financial sense « The Voice for School Choice

  19. Pingback: Superintendent Jim Rex supports Student Scholarships « The Voice for School Choice

  20. Pingback: Chronic illiteracy plagues SC Public Schools « The Voice for School Choice

  21. Pingback: The Opportunity of School Choice « The Voice for School Choice

  22. Pingback: South Carolina’s Jim Rex likes vacation, not tough questions « The Voice for School Choice

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s