Fees to see how your taxes are spent?!

submit-the-bill

According to new research from the SC Policy Council, the big-spenders in the K-12 public education machine aren’t big fans of disclosure.

While district superintendents, school board members and other bureaucrats enjoy reign over $11,480+ per student in public money, they don’t want to publicize the details of their spending.

Last year, lawmakers introduced legislation calling for an online check register in each school district. This low-cost high-tech method of releasing spending ledgers, credit card statements and check copies was rejected by secretive “public educators” who want free reign over public funds.

Now, the Policy Council has filed a freedom of information act (FOIA) request to learn the details of that spending. While each district can request some minimal compensation for the filing and coping costs associated with the inquiry, Policy Council staffers were shocked when they received replies from throughout the state:

Despite the legislature’s clear intent to make public records available at low cost, the charges quoted by school districts of similar size and budget varied substantially. Responses for identical records requests were as follows:

* 13 districts quoted more than $10,000 for expense records
* 10 districts quoted $1,000 or less for the same request
* The average cost of each district response was $9,818

Greenwood County School District 52 had the highest quote, demanding $217,192. The district justified this amount by claiming 40 hours of staff time plus paper copy expenses. After discounting 10,000 copies at 25 cents per page, labor amounts to $5,367 per hour. That equals an annual salary of more than $10.7 million.

Greenwood 52 has 1,597 students and $14.7 million in total expenditures. For comparison, Florence County School District 5 is nearly identical in size and budget with 1,583 students and $14.8 million in total expenditures. Florence 5 quoted $464 as the cost of providing identical public records. That is more than 467 times less than the Greenwood 52 quote.

More details and a district-by-district breakdown in the charges here.

Advertisements

One response to “Fees to see how your taxes are spent?!

  1. Lexington 1 would definately not want the public to know where they are spending tax dollars.

    Lexington 1 has no problem spending six figures+ on an attorney to protect them when they knowlingly deny a child a Free Edcucation.

    As if denying the child access to the services that the funds are allocated for, paying a high dollar law firm hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees to protect against ongoing retaliation efforts.

    Legal fees should be limited to a “small” fraction of the per child allocation per year with no “Roll-over” availability from one child to another.

    IDEA was never designed to guarantee wealth to local law firms. Even if Lexington 1 would disclose how much money has been paid in legal fees for non-law suit or non due-process cases, there would be some shocked tax payers who would not be simpathetic to State budget cuts.

    Large law firms that represent sc school districts can’t afford for children to have school choice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s